The Project Gutenberg eBook of The chemical nature of the alpha particles from radioactive substances
    
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: The chemical nature of the alpha particles from radioactive substances

Author: Ernest Rutherford

Release date: July 2, 2023 [eBook #71088]

Language: English

Original publication: Sweden: Nobel Foundation

Credits: Laura Natal Rodrigues (Images generously made available by the Nobel Foundation.)


*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CHEMICAL NATURE OF THE ALPHA PARTICLES FROM RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES ***


                        ERNEST RUTHERFORD



                          NOBEL LECTURE
                        December 11, 1908.




             THE CHEMICAL NATURE OF THE ALPHA PARTICLES
                     FROM RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES


The study of the properties of the α-rays has played a notable part in
the development of radioactivity and has been instrumental in bringing
to light a number of facts and relationships of the first importance.
With increase of experimental knowledge there has been a growing
recognition that a large part of radioactive phenomena is intimately
connected with the expulsion of the α-particles. In this lecture an
attempt will be made to give a brief historical account of the
development of our knowledge of the α-rays and to trace the long and
arduous path trodden by the experimenter in the attempts to solve the
difficult question of the chemical nature of the α-particles. α-rays
were first observed in 1899 as a special type of radiation and during
the last six years there has been a persistent attack on this great
problem, which has finally yielded to the assault when the resources of
the attack seemed almost exhausted.

Shortly after his discovery of the radiating power of uranium by the
photographic method, Becquerel showed that the radiation from uranium
like the Röntgen-rays possessed the property of discharging an
electrified body. In a detailed investigation of this property, I
examined the effect on the rate of discharge by placing successive
layers of thin aluminium foil over the surface of a layer of uranium
oxide and was led to the conclusion that two types of radiation of very
different penetrating power were present. The conclusions at that period
were summed up as follows:

"These experiments show that the uranium, radiation is complex and
that there are present at least two distinct types of radiation--one
that is very readily absorbed, which will be termed for convenience the
α-radiation, and the other of a more penetrative character, which will
be termed the β-radiation."[1] When other radioactive substances were
discovered, it was seen that the types of radiation present were
analogous to the β– and α-rays of uranium and when a still more
penetrating type of radiation from radium was discovered by Villard, the
term γ-rays was applied to them. The names thus given soon came into
general use as a convenient nomenclature for the three distinct types of
radiation emitted from uranium, radium, thorium, and actinium. On
account of their insignificant penetrating power, the α-rays were at
first considered of little importance and attention was mainly directed
to the more penetrating β-rays. With the advent of active preparations
of radium, Giesel in 1899 showed that the β-rays from this substance
were easily deflected by a magnetic field in the same direction as a
stream of cathode rays and consequently appeared to be a stream of
projected particles carrying a negative charge. The proof of the
identity of the β-particles with the electrons constituting the cathode
rays was completed in 1900 by Becquerel, who showed that the β-particles
from radium had about the same small mass as the electrons and were
projected at a speed comparable with the velocity of light. Time does
not allow me to enter into the later work of Kaufmann and others on this
subject, which has greatly extended our knowledge of the constitution
and mass of electrons.

In the meantime, further investigation had disclosed that the
α-particles produced most of the ionization observed in the
neighbourhood of an unscreened radioactive substance, and that most of
the energy radiated was in the form of α-rays. It was calculated by
Rutherford and McClung in 1901 that one gram of radium radiated a large
amount of energy in the form of α-rays.

The increasing recognition of the importance of the α-rays in
radioactive phenomena led to attempts to determine the nature of this
easily absorbed type of radiation. Strutt (Lord Rayleigh) in 1901 and
Sir William Crookes in 1902 suggested that they might possibly prove to
be projected particles carrying a positive charge. I independently
arrived at the same conclusion from consideration of a variety of
evidence. If this were the case, the α-rays should be deflected by a
magnetic field. Preliminary work showed that the deflection was very
slight if it occurred at all. Experiments were continued at intervals
over a period of two years and it was not until 1902, when a preparation
of radium of activity 19,000 was available, that I was able to show
conclusively that the particles were deflected by a magnetic field,
though in a very minute degree compared with the β-rays. This showed
that the α-rays consisted of projected charged particles while the
direction of deflection indicated that each particle carried a positive
charge. The α-particles were shown to be deflected also by an electric
field and from the magnitude of the deflection, it was deduced that the
velocity of the swiftest particles was about 2.5 x 10^9 cm per second, or
one-twelfth the velocity of light, while the value of _e/m_--the ratio
of the charge carried by the particle to its mass--was found to be
5,000 electromagnetic units. Now it is known from the data of the
electrolysis of water that the value of _e/m_ for the hydrogen atom is
9,650. If the α-particle carried the same positive charge as the unit
fundamental charge of the hydrogen atom, it was seen that the mass of
the α-particle was about twice that of the hydrogen atom. On account of
the complexity of the rays it was recognized that the results were only
approximate, but the experiments indicated clearly that the α-particle
was atomic in mass and might prove ultimately to be either a hydrogen or
a helium atom or the atom of some unknown element of light atomic
weight. These experiments were repeated by Des Coudres in 1903 with
similar results, while Becquerel showed the deflection of the α-rays in
a magnetic field by the photographic method.

This proof that the α-particles consisted of actual charged atoms of
matter projected with an enormous velocity at once threw a flood of
light on radioactive processes, in particular upon another important
series of investigations which were being contemporaneously carried on
in the Laboratory at Montreal in conjunction with Mr. F. Soddy. Had time
permitted, it would have been of interest to consider in some detail the
nature of these researches which placed on a firm foundation the now
generally accepted "transformation theory" of radioactivity. From a
close examination of the substances thorium, radium, and uranium,
Rutherford and Soddy had reached the conclusion that radioactive bodies
were in a state of transformation, as a result of which a number of new
substances were produced entirely distinct in chemical and physical
character from the parent element. From the independence of the rate of
transformation of chemical and physical agencies, it was recognized that
the transformation was atomic and not molecular in character. Each of
these new bodies was shown to lose its radioactive properties according
to a definite law. Even before the discovery of the material nature of
the α-rays, it had been considered probable that the radiation from any
particular substance accompanied the breaking up of its atoms. The proof
that the α-particle was an ejected atom of matter at once strengthened
this conclusion and at the same time gave a more concrete and definite
representation of the processes occurring in radioactive matter. The
point of view reached by us at that time is clearly seen from the
following quotation, which with little alteration holds good today.
"The results obtained so far point to the conclusion that the
beginning of the succession of chemical changes taking place in
radioactive bodies is due to the emission of the α-rays, i.e. the
projection of a heavy charged mass from the atom. The portion left
behind is unstable, undergoing further chemical changes which are again
accompanied by the emission of α-rays, and in some cases also of β-rays.

"The power possessed by the radioactive bodies of apparently
spontaneously projecting large masses with enormous velocities supports
the view that the atoms of these substances are made up, in part at
least, of rapidly rotating or oscillating systems of heavy charged
bodies, large compared with the electron. The sudden escape of these
masses from their orbit may be due either to the action of internal
forces or external forces of which we have at present no knowledge."[2]

Consider for a moment the explanation of the changes in radium. A minute
fraction of the radium atoms is supposed each second to become unstable,
breaking up with explosive violence. A fragment of the atom--and
α-particle--is ejected at a high speed, and the residue of the atom,
which has a lighter weight than before, becomes an atom of a new
substance, the radium emanation. The atoms of this substance are far
more unstable than those of radium and explode again with the expulsion
of an α-particle. As a result the atom of radium A makes its appearance
and the process of disintegration thus started continues through a long
series of stages.

I can only refer in passing here to the large amount of work done by
various experimenters in analysing the long series of transformations of
radium and thorium and actinium; the linking up of radium with uranium
and the discovery by Boltwood of the long looked-for and elusive parent
of radium, viz. ionium. This phase of the subject is of unusual interest
and importance but has only an indirect bearing on the subject of my
lecture. It has been shown that the great majority of the transition
elements produced by the transformation of uranium and thorium break up
with the expulsion of α-particles. A few, however, throw off only
β-particles, while some are "rayless", i.e. undergo transformation
without the expulsion of high-speed α– and β-particles. It is
necessary to suppose that in these latter cases the atoms break up with
the expulsion of α-particles at a speed too low to be detected, or, as
is more probable, undergo a process of atomic rearrangement without the
expulsion of material particles of atomic dimensions.

Another striking property of radium was soon seen to be connected with
the expulsion of α-particles. In 1903 P. Curie and Laborde showed that
radium was a self-heating substance and was always above the temperature
of the surrounding air. It seemed probable from the beginning that the
effect must be the result of the heating effect due to the impact of the
α-particles on the radium. Consider for a moment a pellet of radium
enclosed in a tube. The α-particles are shot out in great numbers
equally from all parts of the radium and in consequence of their slight
penetrating power are all stopped in the radium itself or by the walls
of the tube. The energy of motion of the α-particles is converted into
heat. On this view the radium is subject to a fierce and unceasing
bombardment by its own particles and is heated by its own radiation.
This was confirmed by the work of Rutherford and Barnes in 1903, who
showed that three quarters of the heating effect of radium was not
directly due to the radium but to its product, the emanation, and that
each of the different substances produced in radium gave out heat in
proportion to the energy of the α-particles expelled from it. These
experiments brought clearly to light the enormous energy, compared with
the weight of matter involved, which was emitted during the
transformation of the emanation. It can readily be calculated that one
kilogram of the radium-emanation and its products would initially emit
energy at the rate of 14,000 horse-power, and during its life would give
off energy corresponding to about 80,000 horse-power for one day.
It was thus clear that the heating effect of radium was mainly a
secondary phenomenon resulting from the bombardment by its own
α-particles. It was evident also that all the radioactive substances
must emit heat in proportion to the number and energy of the α-particles
expelled per second.

We must now consider another discovery of the first importance. In
discussing the consequences of the disintegration theory, Rutherford and
Soddy drew attention to the fact that any stable substances produced
during the transformation of the radio-elements should be present in
quantity in the radioactive minerals, where the processes of
transformation have been taking place for ages. This suggestion was
first put forward in 1902.[3] "In the light of these results and the
view that has already been put forward of the nature of radioactivity,
the speculation naturally arises whether the presence of helium in
minerals and its invariable association with uranium and thorium, may
not be connected with their radioactivity, and again[4]." "It is
therefore to be expected that if any of the unknown ultimate products of
the changes of a radioactive element are gaseous, they would be found
occluded, possibly in considerable quantities, in the natural minerals
containing that element. This lends support to the suggestion already
put forwards, that possibly helium is an ultimate product of the
disintegration of one of the radioactive elements, since it is only
found in radioactive minerals."

It was at the same time recognized that it was quite possible that the
α-particle itself might prove to be a helium atom. As only weak
preparations were then available, it did not seem feasible at that time
to test whether helium was produced from radium. About a year later,
thanks to Dr. Giesel of Braunschweig, preparations of pure radium
bromide were made available to experimenters. Using 30 milligrams of
Giesel's preparation, Sir William Ramsay and Soddy in 1903 were able
to show conclusively that helium was present in radium some months old
and that the emanation produced helium. This discovery was of the
greatest interest and importance, for it brought to light that in
addition to a series of transition elements, radium also gave rise in
its transformation to a stable form of matter.

A fundamental question immediately arose as to the position of helium in
the scheme of transformations of radium. Was the helium the end or final
product of transformation of radium or did it arise at some other stage
or stages? In a letter to _Nature_[5] I pointed out that probably helium
was derived from the α-particles fired out by the α-ray products of
radium and made an approximate estimate of the rate of production of
helium by radium. It was calculated that the amount of helium produced
per gram of radium should lie between 20 and 200 cubic millimetres per
year and probably nearer the latter estimate. The data available for
calculation at that time were imperfect, but it is of interest to note
that the rate of production of helium recently found by Sir James Dewar,
in 1908, viz. 134 cubic millimetres per year, is not far from the value
calculated as most probable at that time.

These estimates of the rate of production of helium were later modified
as new and more accurate data became available. In 1905, I measured the
charge carried by the α-particles from a thin film of radium. Assuming
that each α-particle carried the ionic charge measured by J.J. Thomson,
I showed that 6.2 x 10^10 α-particles were expelled per second per gram
of radium itself and four times this number when radium was in
equilibrium with its three α-ray products. The rate of production of
helium calculated on these data was 240 cubic millimetres per gram per
year.

In the meantime, by the admirable researches of Bragg and Kleeman in
1904, our knowledge of the character of the absorption of the
α-particles by matter had been much extended. It had long been known
that the absorption of α-particles by matter was different in many
respects from that of the β-rays. Bragg showed that these differences
arose from the fact that the α-particle, on account of its great energy
of motion, was not deflected from its path like the β-particle, but
travelled in nearly a straight line, ionizing the molecules in its path.
From a thin film of matter of one kind, the α-particles were all
projected at the same speed and lost their power of producing ionization
suddenly, after traversing a certain definite distance of air. The
velocity of the α-particles in this view were reduced by their passage
through matter by equal amounts. These conclusions of Bragg were
confirmed by experiments I made by the photographic method. As a source
of rays, a thin film of radium C, deposited from the radium-emanation on
a thin wire, was used. By examining the deflection of the rays in a
magnetic field, it was found that the rays were homogeneous and were
expelled from the surface of the wire at an identical speed. By passing
the rays through a screen of mica or aluminium, it was found that the
velocity of all the α-particles were reduced by the same amount and the
issuing beam was still homogeneous.

A remarkable result was noted. All α-particles apparently lost their
characteristic properties of ionization, phosphorescence and
photographic action, at exactly the same point while they were still
moving at a speed of about 9,000 kilometres per second. At this critical
speed, the α-particle suddenly vanishes from our ken and can no longer
be followed by the methods of observation at our command.

The use of a homogeneous source of α-rays like radium C at once
suggested itself as affording a basis for a more accurate determination
of the value of _e/m_ for the α-particle and for seeing whether the value
was consistent with the view that the α-particle was a charged atom of
helium. In the course of a long series of experiments, I proved that the
α-particles, whether expelled from radium, thorium or actinium, were
identical in mass and must consist of the same kind of matter.

The velocity of expulsion of the α-particles from different kinds of
active matter varied over comparatively narrow limits but the value of
_e/m_ was constant and equal to 5,070. This value was not very different
from the one originally found. A difficulty at once arose in
interpreting this result. We have seen that the value of _e/m_ for the
hydrogen atom is 9,650. If the α-particle carried the same positive
charge as the hydrogen atom, the value of _e/m_ for the α-particle would
indicate that its mass was twice that of the hydrogen atom, i.e. equal
to the mass of a hydrogen molecule. It seemed very improbable that
hydrogen should be ejected in a molecular and not an atomic state as a
result of the atomic explosion. If, however, the α-particle carried a
charge equal to twice that of the hydrogen atom, the mass of the
α-particle would work out at nearly four, i.e. a mass nearly equal to
that of the atom of helium.

I suggested that, in all probability, the α-particle was a helium atom
which carried two unit charges. On this view, every radioactive
substance which emitted α-particles must give rise to helium. This at
once offered an explanation of the fact observed by Debierne that
actinium as well as radium produced helium. It was pointed out that the
presence of a double charge of helium-atom was not altogether improbable
for reasons to be given later.

While the evidence as a whole strongly supported the view that the
α-particle was a helium atom, it was found exceedingly difficult to
obtain a decisive experimental proof of the relation. If it could be
shown experimentally that the α-particle did in reality carry two unit
charges, the proof of the relation would be greatly strengthened. For
this purpose an electrical method was devised by Rutherford and Geiger
for counting directly the α-particles expelled from a radioactive
substance. The ionization produced in a gas by a single α-particle is
exceedingly small and would be difficult to detect electrically except
by a very refined method. Recourse was had to an automatic method of
magnifying the ionization produced by an α-particle. For this purpose it
was arranged that the α-particles should be fired through a small
opening into a vessel containing air or other gas at a low pressure,
exposed to an electric field near the sparking value. Under these
conditions the ions produced by the passage of the α-particle through
the gas generate a large number of fresh ions by collision. In this way
it was found possible to magnify the electrical effect due to an
α-particle several thousand times. The entrance of an α-particle into
the testing vessel was then indicated by a sudden deflection of the
electrometer needle. This method was developed into an accurate method
of counting the number of α-particles fired in a known time through the
small aperture of the testing vessel. From this was deduced the total
number of α-particles expelled per second from any thin film of
radioactive matter. In this way it was shown that 3.4 x 10^10 α-particles
are expelled per second from one gram of radium itself and from each of
its α-ray products in equilibrium with it.

The correctness of this method was indicated by another, quite distinct
method of counting. Sir William Crookes and Elster and Geitel had shown
that the α-particles falling on a screen of phosphorescent zinc sulphide
produced a number of scintillations. Using specially prepared screens,
Rutherford and Geiger counted the number of these scintillations per
second with the aid of a microscope. It was found that, within the limit
of experimental error, the number of scintillations per second on a
screen agreed with the number of α-particles impinging on it, counted by
the electrical method. It was thus clear that each α-particle produced a
visible scintillation on the screen, and that either the electrical or
the optical method could be used for counting the α-particles. Apart
from the purpose for which these experiments were made, the results are
of great interest and importance, for it is the first time that it has
been found possible to detect a single atom of matter by its electrical
and optical effect. This is of course only possible because of the great
velocity of the α-particle.

Knowing the number of α-particles expelled from radium from the counting
experiment, the charge carried by each α-particle was determined by
measuring the total positive charge carried by all the α-particles
expelled. It was found that each α-particle carried a positive charge of
9.3 x 10^-10 electrostatic units. From a consideration of the
experimental evidence of the charge carried by the ions in gases, it was
concluded that the α-particle did carry two unit charges, and that the
unit charge carried by the hydrogen atom was equal to 4.65 x 10^-10
units. From a comparison of the known value of _e/m_ for the α-particle
with that of the hydrogen atom, it follows that an α-particle is a
projected atom of helium carrying two charges, or, to express it in
another way, the α-particle, after its charge is neutralized, is a
helium atom.

The data obtained from the counting experiments allow us to calculate
simply the magnitude of a number of important radioactive quantities. It
was found that the calculated values of the life of radium, of the
volume of the emanation, and of the heating effect of radium were in
excellent agreement with the values found experimentally. A test of the
correctness of these methods of calculation was forthcoming shortly
after the publication of these results. Rutherford and Geiger
calculated, on the assumption that the α-particle was a helium atom,
that one gram of radium in equilibrium should produce a volume of 158
cubic millimetres of helium per year. Sir James Dewar in 1908 carried
out a long experimental investigation on the rate of production of
helium by radium, and showed that one gram of radium in equilibrium
produced about 134 cubic millimetres per year. Considering the
difficulty of the investigation, the agreement between the experimental
and calculated values is very good and is strong evidence in support of
the identity of the α-particle with a helium atom.

While the whole train of evidence we have considered indicates with
little room for doubt that the α-particle is a projected helium atom,
there was still wanting a decisive and incontrovertible proof of the
relationship. It might be argued, for example, that the helium atom
appeared as a result of the disintegration of the radium atom in the
same way as the atom of the emanation and had no direct connection with
the α-particle. If one helium atom were liberated at the same time that
an α-particle was expelled, experiment and calculation might still
agree and yet the α-particle might be an atom of hydrogen or of some
unknown substance. In order to remove this possible objection, it is
necessary to show that the α-particles, collected quite independently
of the active matter from which they are expelled, give rise to helium.
With this purpose in view some experiments were recently (1908) made by
Rutherford and Royds. A large quantity of emanation was forced into a
glass tube which had walls so thin that the α-particles were fired
right through them, though the walls were impervious to the emanation
itself. The α-particles were projected into the glass walls of an outer
sealed vessel and were gradually released into the exhausted space
between the emanation tube and the outer vessel. After some days a
bright spectrum of helium was observed in the outer vessel. There is,
however, one objection to this experiment. It might be possible that the
helium observed had diffused through the thin glass walls from the
emanation. This objection was removed by showing that no trace of helium
appeared, when the emanation was replaced by a larger volume of helium
itself. We may thus confidently conclude that the α-particles
themselves give rise to helium, and are atoms of helium. Further
experiments showed that when the α-particles were fired through the
glass walls into a thin sheet of lead or tin, helium could always be
obtained from the metals after a few hours' bombardment.

Considering the evidence together, we conclude that the α-particle is a
projected atom of helium, which has, or in some way during its flight
acquires, two unit charges of positive electricity. It is somewhat
unexpected that the atom of a monatomic gas like helium should carry a
double charge. It must not however be forgotten that the α-particle is
released at a high speed as a result of an intense atomic explosion, and
plunges through the molecules of matter in its path. Such conditions are
exceptionably favourable to the release of loosely attached electrons
from the atomic system. If the α-particle can lose two electrons in this
way, the double positive charge is explained.

We have seen that there is every reason to believe that the α-particles,
so freely expelled from the great majority of radioactive substances,
are identical in mass and constitution and must consist of atoms of
helium. We are consequently driven to the conclusion that the atoms of
the primary radioactive elements like uranium and thorium must be built
up in part at least of atoms of helium. These atoms are released at
definite stages of the transformations at a rate independent of control
by laboratory forces. There is good reason to believe that in the
majority of cases, a single helium atom is expelled during the atomic
explosion. This is certainly the case for radium itself and its series
of products. On the other hand, Bronson has drawn attention to certain
cases, viz. the emanations of actinium and of thorium, where apparently
two and three atoms of helium respectively are expelled at one time. No
doubt these exceptions will receive careful investigation in the future.
It is of interest to note that uranium itself appears to expel two
α-particles for one from each of its products. Knowing the number of
atoms of helium expelled from the atom of each product, we can at once
calculate the atomic weights of the products. For example, in the
uranium-ionium-radium series, uranium expels two α-particles and each of
the six following α-ray products one, i.e. eight in all. Taking the
atomic weight of uranium as 238.5, the atomic weight of ionium should be
230.5, of radium 226.5, of the emanation 222.5, and so on. It is of
interest to note that the atomic weight of radium deduced in this way is
in close agreement with the latest experimental values. The atomic
weight of the end-product of radium, resulting from the transformation
of radium F (polonium) should be 238.5 – 8 x 4 = 206.5, or a value
close to that for lead. Long ago, Boltwood suggested from examination of
analyses of old uranium minerals, that lead was in all probability a
transformation product of the uranium-radium series. The coincidence of
numbers is certainly striking, but a direct proof of the production of
lead from radium will be required before this conclusion can be
considered as definitely established.

It is very remarkable that a chemically inert element like helium should
play such a prominent part in the constitution of the atomic systems of
uranium and thorium and radium. It may well be that this property of
helium of forming complex atoms is in some way connected with its
inability to enter into ordinary chemical combinations. It must not be
forgotten that uranium and thorium and each of their transformation
products must be regarded as distinct chemical elements in the ordinary
sense. They differ from ordinary elements in the comparative instability
of their atomic systems. The atoms break up spontaneously with great
violence, expelling in many cases an atom of helium at a high speed. All
the evidence is against the view that uranium or thorium or radium can
be regarded as an ordinary molecular compound of helium with some known
or unknown element, which breaks up into helium. The character of the
radioactive transformations and their independence of temperature and
other agencies have no analogy in ordinary chemical changes.

Apart from their radioactivity and high atomic weight, uranium, thorium,
and radium show no specially distinctive chemical behaviour. Radium for
example is closely allied in general chemical properties to barium. It
is consequently not unreasonable to suppose that other elements may be
built up in part of helium, although the absence of radioactivity may
prevent us from obtaining any definite proof. On this view, it may prove
significant that the atomic weights of many elements differ by four--the
atomic weight of helium--or a multiple of four. Time is too limited
to discuss in greater detail these and other interesting questions which
have been raised by the proof of the chemical nature of the
α-particle.


[Footnote 1: E. Rutherford, Uranium radiation and the electrical
conduction produced by it, _Phil. Mag._, 47 (1899) 116.]

[Footnote 2: E. Rutherford and F. Soddy, _Phil. Mag._, 5 (1903), 106.]

[Footnote 3: E. Rutherford and F. Soddy, _Phil. Mag._, 4 (1902), 582.]

[Footnote 4: E. Rutherford and F. Soddy, _Phil. Mag._, 5 (1903), 453.]

[Footnote 5: E. Rutherford, letter in _Nature_, _69_ (Aug. 20, 1903).]



*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CHEMICAL NATURE OF THE ALPHA PARTICLES FROM RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES ***


    

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.


START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.”
    
    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
        works.
    
    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    
    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
    

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.