The Project Gutenberg eBook of Personal rights
    
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: Personal rights
        A presidential address delivered to the forty-first annual meeting of the Personal Rights Association on 6th June 1913

Author: Mona Caird

Release date: April 16, 2025 [eBook #75874]

Language: English

Original publication: London: The Personal Rights Association, 1913

Credits: Bob Taylor, Mairi and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from images made available by the HathiTrust Digital Library.)


*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PERSONAL RIGHTS ***





  Transcriber’s Note
  Italic text displayed as: _italic_
  Bold text displayed as: =bold=




  PERSONAL RIGHTS:

  A PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS

  Delivered to the

  FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING

  of the

  PERSONAL RIGHTS ASSOCIATION,

  ON 6th JUNE, 1913,

  by

  MRS. MONA CAIRD.


  LONDON:
  THE PERSONAL RIGHTS ASSOCIATION,
  11, ABBEVILLE ROAD, LONDON, S.W.


  Price: ONE PENNY.




  PRINTED FOR THE PERSONAL RIGHTS ASSOCIATION,
  BY THE TOKIO PRINTING CO., READING & LONDON




MRS. MONA CAIRD

ON

PERSONAL RIGHTS.


LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:—I used to feel some impatience with public
speakers who spent half their speech in explaining how it was they had
committed the indiscretion of making it, and how much more suitable for
the post somebody else would have been.

Those gentlemen now have my profoundest sympathy!

I feel that I ought to spend not half, but my whole speech, in
explaining why I have the temerity to address you tonight on this
familiar subject, seeing that I never do speak in public, and that my
feelings about taking the chair are very much like they would be about
taking a cold plunge in the Atlantic in early spring.

However, I can’t get rid of my deficiencies by enumerating them, so I
must just throw myself on your mercy, asking you to regard this venture
as a tribute of admiration and gratitude to our President and his
supporters who have made so magnificent a defence of the Cause for so
many thankless years. Also I have felt moved to accept the honour on
account of the scarcity of wholehearted champions, especially—I regret
to hear—among the sex which has always been deprived of personal rights.

Perhaps that is just why they _are_ lacking in respect for them! And
what a warning this is! The spirit of liberty, it would appear, can
be starved to death. Society, having done its foolish best to destroy
that spirit in half its members, expects the other half to retain it
unimpaired—an obvious impossibility. For interaction of influence is
incessant and universal between the two sexes.

The career of women having depended not on right but on favour, they
have learnt to care little for an abstract idea which has no bearing
on their lives. Only the exceptional mind cares for that. But similar
conditions would assuredly produce the same result in men. And—we are
on our rapid way to similar conditions.

Now, in a vast subject like this, which really touches the heart of
everything that is vital and valuable in life, it is impossible, in
twenty-five minutes to deal with it in any detail; and I propose
tonight simply to dwell upon the perils with which we are all
threatened, in consequence of the present trend of sentiment. For we
have to try and make these perils obvious to the hearts as well as to
the minds of our contemporaries, if there is to be any hope of checking
the present downward tendencies.

It is of little use merely _stating_ that it is perilous to try
to purchase social benefits at the expense of individuals. To the
majority, that seems the safest thing in the world; and, strange to
say, the most just. The ancient idea of vicarious sacrifice is as
rampant today as it was when the groves of ancient temples echoed with
the cries of human victims, burnt on the altars, for the appeasement of
the gods and the good of the community.

The idea of _numbers_ enters largely into the popular idea of right and
wrong—what I call arithmetical morality. Because 100 is ten times more
than 10, it is assumed that ten _persons_ may justly be sacrificed for
the sake of the 100. But that is to confuse mere nonsentient signs with
living conscious beings; surely a strangely stupid proceeding. It is
this deeply-rooted idea which we have to combat.

First of all then, it must be noted, that, as a rule, the less liberty
people enjoy, the less they value or respect it. The preoccupation
will be not with liberty but with the best means of getting on without
it. And the best way of doing that will be—or will seem to be—to force
your own views as much as possible upon your neighbours—otherwise
they will force theirs upon _you_. Mutually lacking in respect for
liberty, there will be as many good reasons for attacking it in others
as you have theories to enforce. And the same for them. The situation
must obviously end in a stupendous tyranny of some kind: whether of
king or oligarchy or State: and that of the State, being practically
invulnerable, is the worst of all.

I am far from thinking that the motive for aggression would always be
self-interest. It would be less dangerous if it were. We all know the
deadly tyranny of the thoroughly well-meaning person: the highly-moral
person, for instance, who calls out for mediæval forms of punishment
for especially reprobated crimes. As some philosopher said: “He must
be an extraordinarily good man before he can safely be guided by his
conscience.” I go farther, and say: “The extraordinarily good man must
be trained for a lifetime by the Personal Rights Association before he
can trust his conscience—and even then he had better not!”

Of all human attributes, conscience, when backed by power over others,
seems to be the most dangerous. Think what martyr-fires it has lighted,
what torture-chambers it has furnished and kept busy! If we had only
self-interest to deal with, we should not be troubled with the present
ardent desire of increasing numbers of people, to further the interests
of Society—of morals, medicine, science—even what are called the true
interests of the individual himself, by progressive outrage against
him. It is this eternal “good motive” that makes our reformers as
irresistible as a swarm of locusts, and as destructive! The bravest of
us flinch before Virtue on the war-path.

Before they have done, our philanthropic locusts will have eaten off
every green blade and leaf of human initiative, and will leave the
Society which they so yearn to serve barren and blight-stricken,
perhaps for centuries to come. Of what value to any one is such a
Society? What in fact, _exists_, but individuals?

And mark: there is no retracing our steps if we go too far in this
direction. We are always assured that there would be a reaction against
a too great restriction of the human spirit. But that is true only so
long as the restriction is more or less a novelty and is _not_ too
great. Directly it becomes really extreme, there is no reaction. We can
see this in the innumerable nations of antiquity and of today which
have remained stagnant for hundreds and hundreds of years. Lack of
human rights tends progressively to stifle the spirit that would demand
or respect them. Even in England, whose history is that of the struggle
for liberty, we have seen how, in women, that spirit has been weakened.
How then are we to hope—after a too deep descent to Avernus—for a
return towards the light and inspiration of freedom? It is expecting a
result without a cause—or rather in the teeth of one.

Like Xerxes, stupidly confident, we burn our boats behind us. Or, more
accurately, Nature burns them for us. She seems to say: “Very well;
if you don’t want to give scope to original minds, you have only to
make your social conditions accordingly—subordinate your individual
ruthlessly to what you call ‘the common good’—and original minds will
never trouble you again. Not only will your organization suppress them,
but it will gradually destroy your power even to produce them. That
will save _them_ an immensity of trouble, and prevent all hitches in
your boring routine. If that’s what you want, it is easily yours.”

But our reformers _don’t_ exactly want that. They like to have it
both ways. They want a subservient, State-ridden community of highly
individualized human beings, who—like the inmates of Barry’s Home for
Geniuses—would initiate punctually and spontaneously to order—in the
approved direction, of course. No fantastic unexpected nonsense would
be tolerated for a moment!

The old pathetic story of Midas, whose wish—granted by the gods—that
everything he touched should turn to gold, seems vaguely symbolic
of this eager desire to turn living, initiating individuals into
subservient parts of a social Whole. It is possible to have a prayer
too completely answered, as poor Midas found, when his best cook’s
masterpieces became hard yellow metal under his teeth, till he starved
amidst fabulous riches; while his heart was finally broken when his
little daughter, running in to bid him good morning, was changed into a
priceless golden statue. Like Midas, our reformers are short-sighted.
Their eyes are so fixed on the Golden Age that they want to bring about
for humanity, that they forget that they may be killing humanity in the
process—the very spring and life-essence of the human material which
they—meddling little amateur deities—are trying so hard to make after
their own image.

Our philanthropists will find when too late, that they have turned
all that is living into hard, precious, valueless gold—the gold of a
mechanical social order—if the gods are cruel enough to grant their
foolish prayers!

I do not say that the day of awakening would never come. To China
and Japan for instance, it _has_ at last come—through _outside_ not
internal causes, be it noted. But think of the spell-bound, horrible
ages of night-mare-ridden sleep that went before!

Once upon a time in old Japan, a man was not allowed to give his
grandchild a doll measuring more than certain carefully prescribed
dimensions. The paternal Powers deemed moderation in dolls to be
desirable, and so curbed undue enthusiasm in grandparents by solemn
legislative measures. It is claimed by its admirers that the system
(whose nature we can gauge from this instance) worked admirably.
Probably it did. So does a regularly-wound clock.

As a matter of fact, the better the preposterous system worked, the
more fatally it would strangle its victims. Now it is this fact which
we all have to try to make clear to our opponents. Humanity growing
fat and prosperous on banquets of immolated individuals would be about
as disastrous a condition as one could well imagine. As a matter of
fact “Humanity”—a mere abstract term used for convenience of speech—has
been endowed by careless thinkers with a sort of divine self-existence;
and, like most divine beings, this new deity demands sacrifices. For
instance, the recent medical proposal to dissect criminals alive in the
interests of the Community—another collective-term fetish—reveals, in
typical form, the line of sentiment (I can scarcely call it thought)
against which we have to contend. I do not say that the majority would
not still be shocked at this proposal; but that is simply because it
has not yet become familiar. Once it does become familiar, the horror
will die away (think of the everyday atrocities which _have_ the public
sanction) and then—as there is no principle of personal rights to stand
between the proposed victim and the eager experimenter—the latter will
be allowed to take his long-coveted prize. He is already permitted to
take innocent, sentient creatures, on the plea of the public good; and
it is only carrying out the theory to its logical conclusion, to take
guilty ones for the same purpose. And on the same plea—like the lie,
“an ever present help in time of trouble”—the ordinary citizen will
probably follow, in due course. It is a question of time and sentiment,
not of principle.

Now is it quite impossible to awaken the public to the awful and
innumerable dangers which confront us all, as soon as the protection
of personal rights is withdrawn? Will not even this threat of human
vivisection reveal our utter defencelessness?

Can we not persuade our contemporaries to ask themselves if, for
instance, the apostles of eugenics have shrunk from _any_ measure,
however outrageous, which they thought promised the desired results?
Provided the end is gained, the individual must pay the price. It seems
to be thought unworthy of him to object. Thus he is placed at the
mercy of every wind and tide of popular opinion, or, what is worse,
at the mercy of the views of experts who naturally tend to think all
things lawful which benefit their particular branch of knowledge. If
vaccination is approved of, vaccinated the individual must be. If
Science demands human vivisection, he must submit even to that outrage.
On what principle, except that of personal rights, can the demand be
refused? The outrage _might_ result in valuable knowledge. Again, if
Society is obsessed by a crude and unproved theory of heredity, how
are we to resist interference with our marriages, or being treated as
hysterical, or feeble-minded, or degenerate, or insane? Genius and
originality generally seem pathological to the majority; and what the
end will be of this sort of old-Japanese system, considering its very
vigorous beginning, is not cheering to prophesy.

Unless its very absurdity causes a reaction before it is too late, we
shall find ourselves in the current of an evolution backwards to the
savage state, in which the individual is very like that foolish and
much overrated insect, the bee, hopelessly submerged in the social hive.

As originality is usually lodged in a peculiarly sensitive organism,
delicately responsive to conditions, it would tend to atrophy, as
plants do whose leaves and buds are persistently nipped off. No living
thing can stand the process long. It is one of the shallowest of
popular fallacies that genius always overcomes obstacles. It depends
on the obstacles and the kind of genius; or, more accurately, on the
ordinary qualities with which the genius happens to be accompanied. In
itself, genius is a handicap, not an aid, to outward success.

Now in the degenerating society which we are considering, its path
of descent is easy to trace. Observe the increasing tragedy of the
situation. As the strata of what I call Hive-heredity accumulate,
there is always a deeper and deeper soil of Hive-instinct out of which
each new generation has to spring. Is it not progressively unlikely,
therefore, that “sports” would appear? And if they did appear, at
lengthening intervals, would they not be handicapped by a strong
Herd-instinct, impregnably seated in that reservoir of inborn impulse
that we now call the “subconscious”?

The more one dwells on this principle of ours, the more its essential
truth and beauty and sanity is revealed. It is so gloriously universal
in its scope! Just in so far as man or animal can enjoy rights or
suffer wrongs, just so far we demand for him protection. We deem it
absurd and irrelevant to ask questions as to his faith or his morals,
or his “importance”; as to the number of his legs, or the nature of his
covering. It is obviously enough that he can _feel_.

We do not say: “He has no friends; let us make him suffer for our
good.” We say: “He is in our hands; therefore we are his guardians to a
man ... and woman!”

And as a result of this loyalty to the least of our brethren, we should
find—if we could but make it universal—that we had made impregnable our
one line of defence against innumerable dangers and evils—our Chatalga
lines, we might call them, of inalienable Personal Rights.

And in strengthening these for the protection of the humblest as well
as the greatest of our brethren, we render increasingly possible all
that makes life interesting, dramatic, and truly worth the living:
all adventures of the human spirit. A vista of possibilities is thus
opened which promises an enrichment in all the relations of life, an
enlargement of the range of consciousness, and therefore of progress,
to which we can actually set no limits.

Compare this with the unspeakable boredom of the hurdy-gurdy existence
of a State-dominated community!

Those who have been used all their lives to the atmosphere of
civilization, often do not realize how easily it can be destroyed. The
curious change that comes over educated persons who have lived long
in the backwoods, gives a hint of my meaning. As a rule, the man—or
woman—has in some way dwindled. The consciousness and comprehension
have narrowed, the perceptions are poorer, slower, less human. The
companioning element has almost gone, and one feels that the common
meeting-ground of civilized humanity has shrivelled almost to nothing.
And so one can but realize that a certain fine flower of the human
spirit—which might be still further glorified and developed—can, on
the other hand, be swiftly annihilated. Humanity, so to speak, loses
its level, like a traveller who has mistaken his way, and walks down
hill only to have to come up again, or else to resign himself to
remaining on the plains—he who had set out for the mountains!

Now, what if this be the reason that civilizations blossom only to
decay? I utterly disbelieve in the facile and misleading analogy of the
“social _organism_.”

Societies do indeed change, but they do _not_ go through an
exactly-repeated series of stages after the fashion of “organisms.”
It is quite unproved that there is any inherent “principle of decay.”
What, in fact, _is_ a principle of decay?

Now, it seems probable that one cause of decay is just this perpetual
losing of level. Like Penelope, humanity has always kept on undoing
its own work, and beginning all over again. And so our civilizations
naturally wither! And is this not, mainly, because we have never yet
learnt a true love of Liberty? Suppose for a moment, a universal
respect for it such as I have just been imagining: a society wherein
there was a real passion for protecting and liberating and giving
scope to the individual impulse and inspiration. Is it not almost
certain that this incessant loss of level—this destruction of previous
achievement would be avoided? And if it were—what is to prevent our
Traveller reaching the Mountains he set out for?




THE PERSONAL RIGHTS ASSOCIATION.

FOUNDED 14th MARCH, 1871.

_OFFICES: 11, ABBEVILLE ROAD, LONDON, S.W._


=President:=

Mr. FRANKLIN THOMASSON, J.P., Ex-M.P.

=Hon. Sec. and Treasurer=: Mr. J. H. LEVY.

=Assistant Secretary=: Mrs. LORENZA GARREAU.

=Bankers=: PARR’S BANK (CHARING CROSS BRANCH), LIMITED.


=OBJECT OF THE ASSOCIATION.=

The object of the Association is to uphold the principle of the perfect
equality of all persons before the law in the exercise and enjoyment of
their Individual Liberty within the widest practicable limits. It would
maintain government just so far as, but no farther than, is necessary
for the maintenance of the largest freedom; and, in applying this,
would have equal regard to the liberty of all citizens.


 =If you wish to join in this work, send a subscription to the Treasurer
 of the Association, at the above address; and the _Individualist_ and
 a copy of each of the pamphlets and leaflets issued by the Association
 will be sent to you, as issued, by post. Do not miss the opportunity
 of cooperating in this work—the breaking of the chains of oppression
 and the liberation of all the forces which work for happiness and
 human dignity.=

 =Cheques and Postal Orders should be crossed Parr’s Bank, Charing Cross
 Branch.=

 =Further information with regard to the Association may be obtained
 from=

  =(Mrs.) LORENZA GARREAU,
  _Assistant Secretary_.=




  Transcriber’s Notes

  pg 6 Changed: The old pathethic story of Midas
            to: The old pathetic story of Midas





*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PERSONAL RIGHTS ***


    

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.


START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.”
    
    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
        works.
    
    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    
    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
    

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.